So Anyway. I wanted to talk about Mr Terry Richardson again. Many of you have been writing me letters telling me how much of an artist Terry Richardson is, and what a swell fellow he is, really.
So i went and did my homework and research on him to see your perspective and why he is such a wonderful artist. Basically i came to this decision. You CAN'T declare Terry Richardson's work art. It never was art anyway. The people who appreciate his work are dull Amarni suit morons. What is it? Well, it's misogynist porn that doesn't turn me on. Do you know what turns me on? One of my Best friends. Shoes. Pete Doherty. Chanel clothing.
But that's not the point- my point is that Richardson's work is half the problem, because it's inherently misogynist, made by a creep who enjoys taking photographs of women on the toilet. It's an absolute indictment upon the fashion industry that magazines like Vice, Vogue, Purple, etc continue to publish this predator's work. Minus vogue this illustrates that magazine is probably run by people who probably make rape jokes all day long.
How responsible of you, placing Mr. Richardson in power, hmmm? And that's not to mention the photographers
"inspired" by him. How original- having a penis in a woman's mouth? That hasn't been done before!
In case you didn't read the above because you're illiterate and only read twitter so basically
If you support Terry Richardson, you are anti-women. If you publish his work, you are anti-women. If you think him using his position of power to rape women is chic, you are anti-women.
AND For an industry that makes an awful lot of money from women, it's not exactly a profitable stance, right?.....
